“The human nature of Christ as such does not constitute a human person. The Logos did not adopt a human person, so that we have two persons in the Mediator, but simply assumed a human nature. . . . [his human nature] has no independent subsistence of its own. . . . the Logos assumed that nature into personal subsistence with Himself. . . .it should be maintained that the divine nature did not undergo any essential change in the incarnation. This also means that it remained impassible, that...